Showing 1 - 20 results of 80,351 for search '(( significant protective cc ) OR ( significantly increased decrease ))', query time: 0.53s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Encapsulation efficiency significantly decreases with increasing starting bacterial concentration. by Kelly C. Freudenberger Catanzaro (6701789)

    Published 2022
    “…Encapsulation efficiency decreased with increasing starting bacterial concentrations. …”
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

    List of the proteins that increased or decreased significantly with the progression of liver fibrosis. by Kumiko Shirai (13014884)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>List of the proteins that increased or decreased significantly with the progression of liver fibrosis.…”
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

    Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines. by Nazima Nasrullah (6874496)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.…”
  13. 13

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
  18. 18
  19. 19

    DNA damage protecting effects of EAExCC. by Srabonti Saha (17452756)

    Published 2025
    “…The protein levels recorded in the serological parameters were 5.74 ± 0.19, 5.36 ± 0.11, 5.74 ± 0.26, 6.02 ± 0.16, 6.18 ± 0.18, and 6.22 ± 0.20 gm/dL for NC, DC, ML, MLMExCC100, MLMExCC200, and MExCC100, respectively. These findings suggest that <i>C. chinense</i> extracts possess strong immunomodulatory effects and potential protection against DNA damage, supporting their therapeutic application in regulating the innate immunity system.…”
  20. 20

    DNA damage protecting effects of MEExCC. by Srabonti Saha (17452756)

    Published 2025
    “…The protein levels recorded in the serological parameters were 5.74 ± 0.19, 5.36 ± 0.11, 5.74 ± 0.26, 6.02 ± 0.16, 6.18 ± 0.18, and 6.22 ± 0.20 gm/dL for NC, DC, ML, MLMExCC100, MLMExCC200, and MExCC100, respectively. These findings suggest that <i>C. chinense</i> extracts possess strong immunomodulatory effects and potential protection against DNA damage, supporting their therapeutic application in regulating the innate immunity system.…”