Search alternatives:
significant protective » significant positive (Expand Search), significant potential (Expand Search), significant proteomic (Expand Search)
protective decrease » progressive decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant protective » significant positive (Expand Search), significant potential (Expand Search), significant proteomic (Expand Search)
protective decrease » progressive decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…<p>(<b>A)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on days 1–22. (<b>B)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on day 22. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Variables and generalized linear mixed models to explore PICS-F impairments.
Published 2025Subjects: -
15
-
16
The effect of HA digestion and HA replenishment alone or with CS on barrier function measured by TEER.
Published 2025“…PS decreased TEER. (C) Different treatments (treatment groups n = 8)with HA and/or CS did not affect TEER recovery after PS treatment, full recovery was seen in all groups after 24 hours. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
Table 2 -
Published 2024“…Additionally, it will likely highlight significant trends in risk and protective factors, such as the dual role of academic achievement—both as a risk and protective factor—and the impact of family-based interventions. …”
-
20
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”