Search alternatives:
significant protective » significant positive (Expand Search), significant potential (Expand Search), significant proteomic (Expand Search)
protective decrease » progressive decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant protective » significant positive (Expand Search), significant potential (Expand Search), significant proteomic (Expand Search)
protective decrease » progressive decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Adjustment step size.
Published 2025“…Integration efficiency increases by 18.7%, and computational complexity is significantly reduced, with average computation time decreased by 15.4%. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
Summary of five key points guiding the Safe Steps evaluation and implementation.
Published 2025Subjects: -
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Toxicity of GO and GO-GA NPs on <i>C. maculatus</i> adults after 24h exposure.
Published 2025Subjects: -
15
Mean persistence (±SE) of GO and GO-GA NPs on <i>Callosobruchus maculatus.</i>
Published 2025Subjects: -
16
Post-effect of GO and GO-GA NPs on progeny production of <i>Callosobruchus maculatus.</i>
Published 2025Subjects: -
17
-
18
PT<sub>50</sub> values of GO and GO-GA NPs against <i>Callosobruchus maculatus.</i>
Published 2025Subjects: -
19
-
20