Search alternatives:
significant range » significant change (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant dangers (Expand Search)
range increase » change increases (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), rapid increase (Expand Search)
ns decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant range » significant change (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant dangers (Expand Search)
range increase » change increases (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), rapid increase (Expand Search)
ns decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
-
64
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
AUC for the Selected Age and BMI Ranges.
Published 2025“…The results indicated that when the BMI range was controlled, the predictive contribution of the T-score became significant. …”
-
69
AUC for the Selected BMI and T-score Ranges.
Published 2025“…The results indicated that when the BMI range was controlled, the predictive contribution of the T-score became significant. …”
-
70
AUC for the Selected Age and T-score Ranges.
Published 2025“…The results indicated that when the BMI range was controlled, the predictive contribution of the T-score became significant. …”
-
71
-
72
-
73
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
Moderate increases to viral infectivity are not predicted to significantly impact immunological outcomes.
Published 2021“…<p>A range of viral infectivity rates (<i>β</i>) from 0% (base) to 50% increase were simulated. …”
-
79
-
80
Normal ranges of liver function proteins.
Published 2023“…The values of aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, and lactate dehydrogenase were significantly increased at the time of diagnosis compared to 6 months prior (<i>p</i><0.001). …”