Search alternatives:
significant rate » significant rates (Expand Search), significant role (Expand Search), significant rise (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
rate based » rule based (Expand Search), made based (Expand Search), game based (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant rate » significant rates (Expand Search), significant role (Expand Search), significant rise (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
rate based » rule based (Expand Search), made based (Expand Search), game based (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
41
Does a correlation exist between delayed vaccination and a decreased vaccine confidence?
Published 2024“…Online questionnaire was sent to their parents, followed by a telephone questionnaire for non-responders. Regarding MMR first dose, a significant association was found between delay and birth order and intellectual/motor delay of children. …”
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
MEG main effect of material: Word-faces.
Published 2019“…<p>(A) Main effect of material: word versus face condition irrespective of memory: significant clusters (<i>p</i><sub>corr</sub> < 0.05) returned by a cluster permutation statistic clustering across sensors, frequencies (“Freq”), and channels. …”
-
53
-
54
-
55
-
56
The map of the study site in Jiangling County, Hubei Province, People’s Republic of China.
Published 2023Subjects: -
57
-
58
-
59
The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
60