Search alternatives:
significant rates » significant role (Expand Search), significant rise (Expand Search), significant risks (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
rates based » rate based (Expand Search), cases based (Expand Search), sites based (Expand Search)
Showing 141 - 160 results of 36,037 for search '(( significant rates based ) OR ( significant ((teer decrease) OR (greater decrease)) ))', query time: 0.86s Refine Results
  1. 141
    The AN and TP adsorption capacities and recovery rates of natural zeolite-based materials.

    The AN and TP adsorption capacities and recovery rates of natural zeolite-based materials. by Yu Jin (360487)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 142
    AN and TP adsorption capacity and recovery rate of corncob biochar-based materials.

    AN and TP adsorption capacity and recovery rate of corncob biochar-based materials. by Yu Jin (360487)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 143
    The empirical type I error rates of eight tests for different sample sizes under nominal significance level 0.05 based on 10,000 replications.

    The empirical type I error rates of eight tests for different sample sizes under nominal significance level 0.05 based on 10,000 replications. by Zhen Meng (308419)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>The empirical type I error rates of eight tests for different sample sizes under nominal significance level 0.05 based on 10,000 replications.…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 144
    Significant difference (p<0.05) for asymmetry study of temporal region based on statistical moments of information rate distribution for Alzheimer’s participants shown in (a) to (c).

    Significant difference (p<0.05) for asymmetry study of temporal region based on statistical moments of information rate distribution for Alzheimer’s participants shown in (a) to (c). by Heng Jie Choong (21866796)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 145
    Accuracy rate under different noise rates on SEA dataset.

    Accuracy rate under different noise rates on SEA dataset. by Yansong Liu (4373785)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 146
    Accuracy rate under different noise rates on SEA dataset.

    Accuracy rate under different noise rates on SEA dataset. by Yansong Liu (4373785)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 147
    Study-related adverse events.

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 148
    Study flow chart.

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 149
    Study CONSORT diagram.

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 150
    The average of accuracy rate, recall rate and dicesimilarity coefficient.

    The average of accuracy rate, recall rate and dicesimilarity coefficient. by Huazhe Wang (11361705)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 151
    The sequence with high common peak rate and high variation peak rate (Group C).

    The sequence with high common peak rate and high variation peak rate (Group C). by Yafei Guo (1543426)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 152
    The sequence with high common peak rate and low variation peak rate (Group B).

    The sequence with high common peak rate and low variation peak rate (Group B). by Yafei Guo (1543426)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 153
    The sequence with low common peak rate and high variation peak rate (Group D).

    The sequence with low common peak rate and high variation peak rate (Group D). by Yafei Guo (1543426)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 154
    Common SVs have significantly higher support in terms of requantification (Sample = Primary tumor).

    Common SVs have significantly higher support in terms of requantification (Sample = Primary tumor). by Riccha Sethi (3617261)

    Published 2020
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 155
    Common SVs have significantly higher support in terms of requantification (Sample = MCF7).

    Common SVs have significantly higher support in terms of requantification (Sample = MCF7). by Riccha Sethi (3617261)

    Published 2020
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 156
    Number of significantly significant (P < 0.05) differentially abundant (SSDA) proteins showing increased or decreased activity (fold change +/- 1.5-fold) relative to time 0 following storage at 9°C or 20°C of infective juveniles of <i>S</i>. <i>carpocapsae</i> or <i>H</i>. <i>megidis</i>.

    Number of significantly significant (P < 0.05) differentially abundant (SSDA) proteins showing increased or decreased activity (fold change +/- 1.5-fold) relative to time 0 followi... by Peter E. Lillis (12368582)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 157
    Calculated number of missed CCs based on the duration of pauses and average CC rate for the simulations.

    Calculated number of missed CCs based on the duration of pauses and average CC rate for the simulations. by Tavleen Sandhu (12239735)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 158
    Elo ratings of Serie A teams.

    Elo ratings of Serie A teams. by Dong Hee Jung (13798326)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 159
    Changes in firms’ ratings while and following COVID-19 based on TOPSIS.

    Changes in firms’ ratings while and following COVID-19 based on TOPSIS. by Chia-Nan Wang (17518818)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 160
    Changes in firms’ ratings while and following COVID-19 based on EDAS.

    Changes in firms’ ratings while and following COVID-19 based on EDAS. by Chia-Nan Wang (17518818)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: