Search alternatives:
significant larger » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
significant rates » significant role (Expand Search), significant rise (Expand Search), significant risks (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
rates decrease » rate decreased (Expand Search), greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant larger » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
significant rates » significant role (Expand Search), significant rise (Expand Search), significant risks (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
rates decrease » rate decreased (Expand Search), greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
Study Data.
Published 2025“…A total of 103 subjects were evaluated, of whom 38 received intravenous dexamethasone (either 4 mg, 8 mg, or 10 mg) during their anesthetic course and 65 patients had not received dexamethasone. The average heart rate (HR) slowing (3.2 bpm ± 3.9 in the control group, 3.7 bpm ± 3.8 in the dexamethasone group), and maximal HR slowing (5.0 bpm ± 3.9 in the control group, 5.0 bpm ± 3.8 in the dexamethasone group) over the five minutes following sugammadex administration were not significant between groups (average HR slowing p = 0.553, maximal HR slowing p = 0.988). …”
-
107
Study outcomes.
Published 2025“…A total of 103 subjects were evaluated, of whom 38 received intravenous dexamethasone (either 4 mg, 8 mg, or 10 mg) during their anesthetic course and 65 patients had not received dexamethasone. The average heart rate (HR) slowing (3.2 bpm ± 3.9 in the control group, 3.7 bpm ± 3.8 in the dexamethasone group), and maximal HR slowing (5.0 bpm ± 3.9 in the control group, 5.0 bpm ± 3.8 in the dexamethasone group) over the five minutes following sugammadex administration were not significant between groups (average HR slowing p = 0.553, maximal HR slowing p = 0.988). …”
-
108
Patient characteristics.
Published 2025“…A total of 103 subjects were evaluated, of whom 38 received intravenous dexamethasone (either 4 mg, 8 mg, or 10 mg) during their anesthetic course and 65 patients had not received dexamethasone. The average heart rate (HR) slowing (3.2 bpm ± 3.9 in the control group, 3.7 bpm ± 3.8 in the dexamethasone group), and maximal HR slowing (5.0 bpm ± 3.9 in the control group, 5.0 bpm ± 3.8 in the dexamethasone group) over the five minutes following sugammadex administration were not significant between groups (average HR slowing p = 0.553, maximal HR slowing p = 0.988). …”
-
109
Spatial information of excitatory neurons in APP/PS1 mice are decreased in dCA1 and vCA1.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.134 ± 0.050, shuffled = 0.123 ± 0.035, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 229 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 22900 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.054, shuffled = 0.124 ± .054, p = 0.13, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 124 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 12400 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
Raw data used to calculate the statistical significances stated in the result section.
Published 2024Subjects: -
118
-
119
-
120
Mortality rates per lifecycle stage [28].
Published 2024“…Implementing rapid vaccination after detecting the virus in ten individuals and achieving 40% coverage could reduce infection rates by 82%, preventing 139,805 cases. Scenario and sensitivity analyses confirm that even with lower vaccination coverage rates, significant benefits are observed: at 10% coverage, the number of infections drops to 115,231, and at 20% coverage, it further reduces to 76,031. …”