Statistically significant union pathways refer to the miRNAs with a decreased expression on day 5. by Morgana Lüdtke Azevedo (15285409)

Statistically significant union pathways refer to the miRNAs with a decreased expression on day 1. by Morgana Lüdtke Azevedo (15285409)

Flow diagram of the study identification and selection process. by SiJin Li (12488187)

Subjects:

Hallmark significant GSVA results. by Yinghao Ren (17915291)

“…A comparison of SLE patients to control subjects identified 269 DEGs, which were enriched in several pathways. Hub genes, including PTX3, DYSF and F2R, were selected through LASSO and RF methods, resulting in a well-performing diagnostic model. …”

Comparison of the results including patients’ survival. by Jarosław Janc (15354114)

The process of selecting participants. by Na Li (6550)

“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>2,925 ovarian cancer patients with liver metastases from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 2010–2019 were included. The primary endpoint was considered as OS and CSS. …”

Exercise protocols and results of included studies. by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

Madrasin decreases transcription of protein-coding genes. by Michael Tellier (8284752)

The research process for the present study. by Feng Huang (62988)

“…Our approach combines machine learning and fixed effects models to evaluate these relationships. Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”

Chemicals that decrease the expression levels of significant TWAS genes negatively associated with UF. by Gayeon Kim (671557)

Publication bias results of the included studies. by Yaru Guo (6371594)

Statistics for modules with eigengenes that correlated significantly with pCO₂ concentration. by Laura H. Spencer (14025963)

Tabulated results of included studies. by Yi Chiann Thai (14691718)

“…The review protocol was written prior to undertaking the review (OSF Registry:<a href="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QPR9J" target="_blank">10.17605/OSF.IO/QPR9J</a>).</p><p>Results</p><p>The search strategy identified 10,298 publications, of which 24 were included. …”

PRISMA flowchart of the study selection process. by Yohannis Derbew Molla (16471771)

“…The inclusion criteria were centered on studies that discussed the frequency, causes, risk factors and results of brain injury, in Ethiopia. The quality of the studies included in the review was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist. …”

Results of whole-brain grey matter analyses and corresponding ROI analyses of labels included in significant clusters. by Daniel Deuter (16976010)

Table of results for included studies. by Elizabeth A. Nash (11619717)

Results of the bias assessment of the included studies. by Peng Chen (6514)

The DAVID results for genes in the significant modules in the blood. by Stephanie O’Donoghue (14639072)

Expression pattern of statistically significantly differentially expressed immune-related genes in CL patients compared to healthy volunteers. by Nasrin Masoudzadeh (20300511)

Regression analysis results with covariates included. by Yu-han Li (19481881)