Search alternatives:
significant retention » significant attention (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search), significant reductions (Expand Search)
retention increased » respiration increased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant retention » significant attention (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search), significant reductions (Expand Search)
retention increased » respiration increased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Participant retention flowchart.
Published 2025“…We used latent class and latent transition analysis to identify subtypes at baseline, determined their consistency at 6- and 12-month follow-ups, and examined transitions over time. We identified a 4-class solution: (1) severe with appetite decrease, (2) severe with appetite increase, (3) moderate severity and (4) low severity. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…<p>(<b>A)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on days 1–22. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
DART-ID decreases missing datapoints across runs.
Published 2019“…Only peptides seen in >50% of experiments are included. (<b>b</b>) Decrease in missing data across all runs after applying DART-ID, for SCoPE-MS and the two bulk sets from <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007082#pcbi.1007082.g004" target="_blank">Fig 4</a> at 1% FDR. …”
-
17
Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (N = 6).
Published 2024“…<p><b>(A)</b> During the cultivation of SMC and ALI we observed significantly differences on day 18 (SMC: 9.61 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 7.73 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) and day 25 (SMC: 8.19 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 6.44 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) ALI cultures showed significantly decreased values compared to SMC. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20