Search alternatives:
significant risk » significant role (Expand Search)
co decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant risk » significant role (Expand Search)
co decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection in the household (children vs. adults).
Published 2025Subjects: -
2
Expression of high-risk CRLs and co-expression CRGs in the GBM cuproptosis model.
Published 2025Subjects: -
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.
Published 2025“…<p>Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.…”
-
7
-
8
Global Land Use Change Impacts on Soil Nitrogen Availability and Environmental Losses
Published 2025“…In contrast, reversing managed to natural ecosystems significantly increased NNM by 20% (9.7, 25.4%) and decreased NN by 89% (−125, −46%), indicating increasing N availability while decreasing potential N loss. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Risk of bias graph.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20