Search alternatives:
significant risk » significant role (Expand Search)
risks decrease » visits decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
significant risk » significant role (Expand Search)
risks decrease » visits decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.
Published 2025“…<p>Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.…”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The study encompassed 36 selected studies involving 44 effect sizes and 914 participants. The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). …”
-
8
Pie charts showing the different patterns of risk factors associated with total colony losses.
Published 2025Subjects: -
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Box plot show that there are no differences between different groups of the size of pus cavity.
Published 2024Subjects: -
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool.
Published 2025“…The DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model and the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of Bias Tool were used for analysis and risk of bias assessment.…”