Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant risk » significant role (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant risk » significant role (Expand Search)
-
3941
Characteristics of included studies.
Published 2025“…The detrimental impacts of decreased occupational balance are increasingly acknowledged, and interventions are emerging. …”
-
3942
-
3943
(a to g) Administration of vitamin D3 increased serum phosphorus and triglycerides.
Published 2025“…Analyses of serum cholesterol, HDL and triglycerides also showed a non-significant decrease in the serum HDL level upon treatment with 125 µg/Kg vitamin D3, but a noticeable increase in the serum triglyceride level was observed with 125 µg/Kg of vitamin D3.…”
-
3944
-
3945
-
3946
-
3947
-
3948
-
3949
-
3950
-
3951
-
3952
-
3953
-
3954
-
3955
-
3956
-
3957
Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of MEK/mTOR Multifunctional Inhibitors as Novel Anticancer Agents
Published 2025“…Additionally, compound LP-65 demonstrated significant modulation of MEK and mTOR signaling activity in human glioma cells (D54) and human melanoma cells (A375), with a corresponding decrease in cellular proliferation and migration. …”
-
3958
Study Data.
Published 2025“…It has also been hypothesized that the bradycardia and rare instances of cardiac arrest occurring after the use of sugammadex may be due to a transient decrease in circulating corticosteroids, causing a temporary ‘mini Addisonian crisis.’ …”
-
3959
Study outcomes.
Published 2025“…It has also been hypothesized that the bradycardia and rare instances of cardiac arrest occurring after the use of sugammadex may be due to a transient decrease in circulating corticosteroids, causing a temporary ‘mini Addisonian crisis.’ …”
-
3960
Criteria for study selection.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”