Search alternatives:
significant risks » significant risk (Expand Search), significant results (Expand Search), significant role (Expand Search)
risks decrease » visits decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
side decrease » fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant risks » significant risk (Expand Search), significant results (Expand Search), significant role (Expand Search)
risks decrease » visits decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
side decrease » fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Average stability values (mean ± standard deviation) and statistical results.
Published 2024Subjects: -
6
Individual stability values for different gait events under various conditions.
Published 2024Subjects: -
7
-
8
-
9
Box plot show that there are no differences between different groups of the size of pus cavity.
Published 2024Subjects: -
10
-
11
Pie charts showing the different patterns of risk factors associated with total colony losses.
Published 2025Subjects: -
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The study encompassed 36 selected studies involving 44 effect sizes and 914 participants. The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). …”
-
18
-
19
-
20