Showing 41 - 60 results of 2,161 for search '(( significant rule based ) OR ( significant inter decrease ))', query time: 0.37s Refine Results
  1. 41
  2. 42

    AFMUC- Restriction Rules. by Shumaila Iqbal (22238550)

    Published 2025
    “…The aspect threat model is then woven into the base use case model. Similarly, an aspect mitigation model is proposed to specify crosscutting mitigations following the AFMUC restriction rules. …”
  3. 43

    Changes in choice representations across rule-based and residual-state decision-making. by R. Becket Ebitz (7841318)

    Published 2020
    “…This is calculated separately for both residual (red) and rule-based (blue) decisions. Error bars = STE across unique matrix elements, asterisks = significant contrasts in both the example pseudopopulation (all <i>p</i> < 0.001, paired <i>t</i> test) and across pseudopopulations (all <i>p</i> < 0.001, bootstrap test, <b><a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000951#pbio.3000951.s002" target="_blank">S2 Fig</a></b>). …”
  4. 44
  5. 45

    Evolving flocking in embodied agents based on local and global application of Reynolds’ rules by Rita Parada Ramos (7571939)

    Published 2019
    “…However, only local, fragmented flocking behaviours tend to evolve when fitness scores are based on the individuals’ conformity to Reynolds’ rules. …”
  6. 46

    Changes in choice representations across rule-based and residual-state decision-making across pseudopopulations. by R. Becket Ebitz (7841318)

    Published 2020
    “…This is calculated separately for both rule-based (blue) and residual (red) decisions. Dots = mean across pseudopopulations, error bars = 95% CI, asterisks = significant contrasts, all <i>p</i> < 0.0001. …”
  7. 47

    Cross-validated changes in choice representations across rule-based and residual-state decision-making. by R. Becket Ebitz (7841318)

    Published 2020
    “…Residual choices that shared a feature were not closer together than choices that did not (mean difference = 0.01, 95% CI = [−0.31, 0.33], <i>p</i> = 0.48). However, rule-based choices that shared a feature were more similar than rule-based choices that did not share a feature (mean difference = 0.97, 95% CI = [0.68, 1.27]). …”
  8. 48
  9. 49
  10. 50
  11. 51

    Restrictiveness of AFMUC Restriction Rules. by Shumaila Iqbal (22238550)

    Published 2025
    “…The aspect threat model is then woven into the base use case model. Similarly, an aspect mitigation model is proposed to specify crosscutting mitigations following the AFMUC restriction rules. …”
  12. 52

    Understandability of AFMUC restriction rules. by Shumaila Iqbal (22238550)

    Published 2025
    “…The aspect threat model is then woven into the base use case model. Similarly, an aspect mitigation model is proposed to specify crosscutting mitigations following the AFMUC restriction rules. …”
  13. 53

    Applicability of AFMUC restriction rules. by Shumaila Iqbal (22238550)

    Published 2025
    “…The aspect threat model is then woven into the base use case model. Similarly, an aspect mitigation model is proposed to specify crosscutting mitigations following the AFMUC restriction rules. …”
  14. 54

    Digital intellectual property rules in RTAs. by Zehui Yu (8116910)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>Based on the technology complexity data of bilateral digital service exports of 64 representative economies in the world from 2010 to 2021, this paper uses the gravity model to explore the heterogeneous trade effects of Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) from the perspective of digital intellectual property rules. …”
  15. 55
  16. 56
  17. 57
  18. 58
  19. 59
  20. 60