Search alternatives:
significant scores » significant sources (Expand Search), significant short (Expand Search), significant progress (Expand Search)
scores based » score based (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 61,985 for search '(( significant scores based ) OR ( significant ((we decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ))', query time: 1.87s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Raw data used to calculate the statistical significances stated in the result section.

    Raw data used to calculate the statistical significances stated in the result section. by Tom Adriaenssens (397863)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    Propensity-score matched open aortic group.

    Propensity-score matched open aortic group. by Tomi Obafemi (12328433)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Propensity-score matched CABG/Valve group.

    Propensity-score matched CABG/Valve group. by Tomi Obafemi (12328433)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Gaze, speech scores displayed on HEARTS.

    Gaze, speech scores displayed on HEARTS. by Atsushi Nakazawa (15892700)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    NN analysis to assign the importance of variables.

    NN analysis to assign the importance of variables. by Sulmaz Ghahramani (3387635)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    The risk score was significantly related to the TME based on the ESTIMATE algorithm.

    The risk score was significantly related to the TME based on the ESTIMATE algorithm. by Yang Fu (295625)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Predictive Significance of Glycosyltransferase-Related lncRNAs in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis and Experimental Validation

    Predictive Significance of Glycosyltransferase-Related lncRNAs in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis and Experimental Validation by Xiaoyu Shen (4715430)

    Published 2025
    “…Nevertheless, research on glycosyltransferase-related lncRNAs (GTRLs) in endometrial cancer (EC) is still unclear. In this study, we constructed a novel prognostic model based on GTRLs using univariate Cox regression, Lasso, and multivariate stepwise Cox regression analysis. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Price&Sent.score—Causality Matrix and Significance (Z-score) Matrix.

    Price&Sent.score—Causality Matrix and Significance (Z-score) Matrix. by Abel Díaz Berenguer (18446599)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    Return&Sent.score—Causality Matrix and Significance (Z-score) Matrix.

    Return&Sent.score—Causality Matrix and Significance (Z-score) Matrix. by Abel Díaz Berenguer (18446599)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Significant 43 phenotypes based on heritability (h^2) with z-score > 4.

    Significant 43 phenotypes based on heritability (h^2) with z-score > 4. by Salvatore D’Antona (14134889)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Scoring system based on significant independent factors of multiple logistic regression analyses.

    Scoring system based on significant independent factors of multiple logistic regression analyses. by Tetsushi Oyama (13236918)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>Scoring system based on significant independent factors of multiple logistic regression analyses.…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    We compared the Fugl-Meyer (FMA) clinical assessment scores for individuals with stroke with their performance for each outcome measure.

    We compared the Fugl-Meyer (FMA) clinical assessment scores for individuals with stroke with their performance for each outcome measure. by Devin Sean Austin (20285144)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Relationship between Z score and significance of difference.

    Relationship between Z score and significance of difference. by Zhipeng Ma (1678696)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    Assessment scores at enrollment.

    Assessment scores at enrollment. by Makoto Shimoyama (17290996)

    Published 2023
    “…We found no significant differences between the intervention and control groups at enrollment. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    Comparison of WHOQOL-BREF mean scores, standard deviations, and significance levels based on sociodemographics.

    Comparison of WHOQOL-BREF mean scores, standard deviations, and significance levels based on sociodemographics. by Muhammad Shahid Iqbal (8720694)

    Published 2020
    “…<p>Comparison of WHOQOL-BREF mean scores, standard deviations, and significance levels based on sociodemographics.…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    CRFS significant scores and contributions.

    CRFS significant scores and contributions. by Bo Yu (241082)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    Mean values and 95% confidence intervals for recovery time, Average NN Interval (AVNN); Standard Deviation of NN Intervals (SDNN), Low Frequency/ High Frequency Ratio (LF/HF); and heart rate (HR) across the three conditions.

    Mean values and 95% confidence intervals for recovery time, Average NN Interval (AVNN); Standard Deviation of NN Intervals (SDNN), Low Frequency/ High Frequency Ratio (LF/HF); and... by Robert Trybulski (10998702)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    Odds ratio analysis of statistically significant variables for TE and CAP scores.

    Odds ratio analysis of statistically significant variables for TE and CAP scores. by Wayne Eskridge (11773009)

    Published 2021
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    PEDro scores of included studies.

    PEDro scores of included studies. by Flor Isela Torres-Rojo (22097369)

    Published 2025
    “…The effect of vigorous interventions showed an increase in antioxidants (Z=2.44, I<sup>2</sup>=67%, p=0.01) and a decrease in oxidants (Z=5.44, I<sup>2</sup>=0%, p<0.00001), while in non-vigorous exercise, no significant differences were observed in redox status.…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    Means and Standard Errors (SE) of statistically significant variables with work-family scores based on caregiving status.

    Means and Standard Errors (SE) of statistically significant variables with work-family scores based on caregiving status. by Karla Williams (3763048)

    Published 2021
    “…<p>Means and Standard Errors (SE) of statistically significant variables with work-family scores based on caregiving status.…”
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: