Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant seed » significant sex (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search), significant based (Expand Search)
seed increases » ses increases (Expand Search), showed increases (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant seed » significant sex (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search), significant based (Expand Search)
seed increases » ses increases (Expand Search), showed increases (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Normalized significant family changes in abundance.
Published 2025“…<p>A) <i>Erysipelotrichaceae</i> significantly increased with CCE treatment; B) <i>Bacteroidales_unclassified</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; C) <i>Desulfovibrionaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; D) <i>Rikenellaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; E) <i>Coriobacteriaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; F) <i>Erysipelotrichaceae</i> significantly increased with TRE treatment.…”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
10
-
11
-
12
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
13
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
19
-
20
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”