Search alternatives:
significant sex » significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
sex decrease » step decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search)
significant sex » significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
sex decrease » step decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…The values are expressed as the means ± SDs and were analyzed according to the variance of the factorial design. **, *** and ****denote <i>p</i> < 0.01, < 0.001 and < 0.0001, respectively; ns = not significant.…”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Association between FF Proximity and BMI by sex.
Published 2025“…The overall association between FF proximity and BMI was not significant but modified by sex (p-<sub>heterogeneity</sub> <0.001). …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Supplementary Material for: Longitudinal Decrease in Left Ventricular Size with Age: Impact on Mortality and Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Published 2025“…Participants were categorized by LVEDD change from baseline: No Change (<5 mm), Decreased (≥5 mm), and Increased (≥5 mm). Results: A decrease in LVEDD was observed in 24% of participants (mean change -9±3 mm) and was significantly associated with older age, female sex, decreased volumes, concentric remodeling and diastolic dysfunction. …”