Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant sex » significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
sex decrease » step decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant sex » significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
sex decrease » step decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search)
-
661
-
662
-
663
SAR distribution in the cerebellum comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
664
-
665
-
666
SAR distribution in the brainstem comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
667
-
668
Simulated and measured S-parameters comparison of miniaturized MIMO mobile terminal antenna.
Published 2025Subjects: -
669
-
670
-
671
SAR distribution in the skull comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
672
-
673
SAR distribution in the scalp comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
674
-
675
-
676
-
677
Pre-RT and post RT D-dimer levels in associated with prognostic significance.
Published 2025Subjects: -
678
Increased or reduced ATGL-1 activity does not significantly change <i>N. parisii</i> growth.
Published 2025Subjects: -
679
-
680
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”