Search alternatives:
significant shape » significant change (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant shape » significant change (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…The values are expressed as the means ± SDs and were analyzed according to the variance of the factorial design. **, *** and ****denote <i>p</i> < 0.01, < 0.001 and < 0.0001, respectively; ns = not significant.…”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Supplementary Material for: Longitudinal Decrease in Left Ventricular Size with Age: Impact on Mortality and Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Published 2025“…Participants were categorized by LVEDD change from baseline: No Change (<5 mm), Decreased (≥5 mm), and Increased (≥5 mm). Results: A decrease in LVEDD was observed in 24% of participants (mean change -9±3 mm) and was significantly associated with older age, female sex, decreased volumes, concentric remodeling and diastolic dysfunction. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Achieving Improved Ion Swarm Shaping Based on Ion Leakage Control in Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Published 2025“…The preserved linearity means avoiding excessive ion loss and shape distortion, ultimately leading to optimal resolving power. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
The effect of HA digestion and HA replenishment alone or with CS on barrier function measured by TEER.
Published 2025“…In (B) and (C) each point represents a mean ± standard deviation. (B) Hyaluronidase treatment (n = 8) gradually increased TEER, this significantly differed from the untreated group (n = 8) and the PS treated group (n = 8) (p < 0,001). …”
-
20