Search alternatives:
significant side » significant sex (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search), significant source (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant side » significant sex (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search), significant source (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
261
-
262
Description of the warning label.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
263
Flow chart of the study.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
264
Summary statistics of the sample.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
265
Product attributes and attribute levels.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
266
Dataset used in this study.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
267
Definitions of the variables.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
268
A sample choice question without a warning label.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
269
A sample choice question with a warning label.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
270
The error between test and simulation results.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
271
Relevant parameters of cutting head and pick.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
272
The stress variation of Node 33.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
273
Deformation trend of the gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
274
Force transformation of cutting head.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
275
3D model of cutting head.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
276
Rigid-flexible coupling mode.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
277
The flow of cutting performance calculation.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
278
Results of different optimization schemes.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
279
Modal shape of the gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
280
Deformation variation of Node 33.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”