Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant side » significant sex (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search), significant source (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant side » significant sex (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search), significant source (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
-
461
-
462
-
463
Summary of significance levels for comparison of surgical segment ROM between different test groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
464
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
465
Descriptive statistics of alcohol consumption in G7 countries (in litres/capita).
Published 2024Subjects: -
466
-
467
-
468
-
469
-
470
-
471
-
472
-
473
Phagocytosis of SMPs by alveolar macrophages of MH-S cell line evaluated by flow cytometry.
Published 2025Subjects: -
474
Trends of incident opioid users, L-TOT users, and L-TOT discontinuers between 2009 and 2013.
Published 2025Subjects: -
475
-
476
-
477
-
478
-
479
-
480
The influence of <i>PINK1</i> on <i>P</i>. <i>berghei</i> infection in <i>A</i>. <i>stephensi</i>.
Published 2024Subjects: