Search alternatives:
significant side » significant sex (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search), significant source (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant side » significant sex (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search), significant source (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
161
-
162
-
163
-
164
Comparison of questionnaire scores among genotypes for the significant associations.
Published 2025Subjects: -
165
-
166
-
167
-
168
-
169
The mean and standard deviation of parameters.
Published 2024“…Results indicated a significant decrease in ML SI in both groups one month after treatment compared to before and after treatment (P = 0.013 and P<0.001, respectively). …”
-
170
The ANCOVA and Post_hoc results.
Published 2024“…Results indicated a significant decrease in ML SI in both groups one month after treatment compared to before and after treatment (P = 0.013 and P<0.001, respectively). …”
-
171
CONSORT flowchart.
Published 2024“…Results indicated a significant decrease in ML SI in both groups one month after treatment compared to before and after treatment (P = 0.013 and P<0.001, respectively). …”
-
172
Time to stabilization in the vertical direction.
Published 2024“…Results indicated a significant decrease in ML SI in both groups one month after treatment compared to before and after treatment (P = 0.013 and P<0.001, respectively). …”
-
173
The description of games.
Published 2024“…Results indicated a significant decrease in ML SI in both groups one month after treatment compared to before and after treatment (P = 0.013 and P<0.001, respectively). …”
-
174
The description of balance training.
Published 2024“…Results indicated a significant decrease in ML SI in both groups one month after treatment compared to before and after treatment (P = 0.013 and P<0.001, respectively). …”
-
175
-
176
-
177
Test soil parameters.
Published 2025“…When the UHMWPE content exceeds 0.3% the weight of the soil, there is no significant decrease in the swelling pressure of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.052, close to the threshold of significance). …”
-
178
Influence of UHMWPE length on swelling pressure.
Published 2025“…When the UHMWPE content exceeds 0.3% the weight of the soil, there is no significant decrease in the swelling pressure of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.052, close to the threshold of significance). …”
-
179
UHMWPF parameters.
Published 2025“…When the UHMWPE content exceeds 0.3% the weight of the soil, there is no significant decrease in the swelling pressure of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.052, close to the threshold of significance). …”
-
180
Influence of UHMWPE content on swelling pressure.
Published 2025“…When the UHMWPE content exceeds 0.3% the weight of the soil, there is no significant decrease in the swelling pressure of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.052, close to the threshold of significance). …”