Search alternatives:
significant side » significant sex (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search), significant source (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
side increase » size increase (Expand Search), size increased (Expand Search), sd increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
significant side » significant sex (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search), significant source (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
side increase » size increase (Expand Search), size increased (Expand Search), sd increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
-
127
-
128
Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…<p>In the recurrence group, the respective treatment counts for anti-VEGF, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± standard deviation) in the year before surgery were 3.0 ± 1.4, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 4.0 ± 2.1, respectively. These significantly decreased to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0.0, and 3.1 ± 2.8 in the first year; 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8 in the second year; and 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 in the third year (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; Dunn’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). …”
-
129
-
130
-
131
Individual stability values for different gait events under various conditions.
Published 2024Subjects: -
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
-
136
Effects of speed and lead side on each integrated-electromyography value (iEMG).
Published 2023“…In all muscles, iEMG significantly increased with speed. The iEMG in Br and Inf was significantly higher in the leading than in the trailing. …”
-
137
-
138
-
139
-
140