Search alternatives:
significant size » significant side (Expand Search), significant shape (Expand Search), significant sex (Expand Search)
size decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), size increase (Expand Search), size increased (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant size » significant side (Expand Search), significant shape (Expand Search), significant sex (Expand Search)
size decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), size increase (Expand Search), size increased (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Soil partice-size distribution.
Published 2025“…The swelling pressure of reinforced expansive soil exhibits a significant negative correlation with both the UHMWPE content (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and its length. …”
-
13
-
14
Adjustment step size.
Published 2025“…Integration efficiency increases by 18.7%, and computational complexity is significantly reduced, with average computation time decreased by 15.4%. …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
Supplementary Material for: Longitudinal Decrease in Left Ventricular Size with Age: Impact on Mortality and Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Published 2025“…Conclusions: A progressive decrease in LVEDD in normal-sized hearts was independently associated with adverse outcomes, highlighting the prognostic importance of declining LV size.…”
-
18
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Published 2025“…Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.…”
-
19
-
20