Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant sizes » significant size (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search), significant shifts (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant sizes » significant size (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search), significant shifts (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
5
-
6
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
Data from: Colony losses of stingless bees increase in agricultural areas, but decrease in forested areas
Published 2025“…We found that colony losses during the rainy season decreased with higher abundance of forested areas and increased with higher abundance of agricultural area around meliponaries. …”
-
12
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Published 2025“…Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.…”
-
13
Supplementary Material for: Longitudinal Decrease in Left Ventricular Size with Age: Impact on Mortality and Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Published 2025“…Participants were categorized by LVEDD change from baseline: No Change (<5 mm), Decreased (≥5 mm), and Increased (≥5 mm). Results: A decrease in LVEDD was observed in 24% of participants (mean change -9±3 mm) and was significantly associated with older age, female sex, decreased volumes, concentric remodeling and diastolic dysfunction. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
Statistically significant linear increase in use of antidepressants during the observed time period.
Published 2025Subjects: -
17
-
18
-
19
-
20