Search alternatives:
significant sizes » significant size (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search), significant shifts (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
significant sizes » significant size (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search), significant shifts (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Adjustment step size.
Published 2025“…Integration efficiency increases by 18.7%, and computational complexity is significantly reduced, with average computation time decreased by 15.4%. …”
-
5
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Published 2025“…Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.…”
-
6
-
7
Summary of five key points guiding the Safe Steps evaluation and implementation.
Published 2025Subjects: -
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20