Search alternatives:
significant sizes » significant size (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search), significant shifts (Expand Search)
better decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), between decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
significant sizes » significant size (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search), significant shifts (Expand Search)
better decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), between decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Effect of session on winning model parameters for set size = 2 and set size = 4 for both male and females.
Published 2024“…Use of one-back strategy parameters changed significantly across sessions for male mice with (C) S1 “Inappropriate Lose Shift” decreasing across sessions, <i>p</i> = 0.01 (D) S2 = S4 “Stimulus Insensitive Win Stay” increasing, <i>p</i> = 0.009 and (E) S3 “Inappropriate Lose Stay” decreasing, <i>p</i> < 0.0001. …”
-
3
-
4
Data from: Decade-long bird trends in China: Stable species richness but increasing biotic homogenization
Published 2025“…We found that species richness remained stable over 10 years, with no directional trend at 84.5% of sites and a small mean effect size (Zr = 0.102, 95% CI = [-0.012; 0.216]). …”
-
5
CCDC66 localizes to the axoneme and regulates primary cilium stability but not cilia formation in IMCD3 cells.
Published 2025“…<i>n</i> > 600 cells for control and >400 cells for CCDC66 depletion. The mean cilia length in CCDC66-depleted cells decreased to 0.67-fold compared to the mean control length. …”
-
6
Table 1_GLP1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors for the prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus onset: a systematic review and meta-analysis.docx
Published 2025“…Moreover, HbA1c levels were assessed in seven studies, where significant reductions in treatment groups were reported with a standardized mean difference of -6.95 (95% CI: [-14.24, 2.98], p-value= 0.06) for the overall effect size. …”