Search alternatives:
significant slight » significant insights (Expand Search), significant shifts (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
slight decrease » slight increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 7,510 for search '(( significant slight decrease ) OR ( significant ((we decrease) OR (greater decrease)) ))', query time: 0.58s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Decreasing oxygen saturation with corresponding levels of NLR and D-dimer for understanding the interplay of inflammation.

    Decreasing oxygen saturation with corresponding levels of NLR and D-dimer for understanding the interplay of inflammation. by Narendran Gopalan (110148)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    A slight negative trend in the relationship between U-Cd levels and BMD in both 2019 and 2022, as evident from the slightly downward-sloping regression lines in both years. However, no statistically significant relationship was found.

    A slight negative trend in the relationship between U-Cd levels and BMD in both 2019 and 2022, as evident from the slightly downward-sloping regression lines in both years. However... by Aroon La-up (14095691)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    Significant condition.

    Significant condition. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Results of significance for regression factors.

    Results of significance for regression factors. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Datasets used in the study.

    Datasets used in the study. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit production per female tree, (C) seed production per female tree; and (D) seed weight. Farming system refers to ecological vs. conventional practices; CCA1 refers to the first axis of the CCA and depicts the relationship between the % of natural habitats in the landscape and the composition of the pollinator community (increase abundance of wild bees with the increase in natural habitats); Male-to-female ratio and Male-to-female ratio<sup>2</sup> indicate linear and quadratic terms, respectively. Significant <i>p</i>-values are marked in bold. RI was estimated by summing the Akaike weights over all the models where each explanatory variable appeared, and highlights the importance of these variables in the models [75].

    Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit... by Carmelo Gómez-Martínez (9384385)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    S1 Graphical abstract -

    S1 Graphical abstract - by Aman Goyal (19231397)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Negative ion mode significant differential metabolites (Fold Change greater than 2 or less than 0.5).

    Negative ion mode significant differential metabolites (Fold Change greater than 2 or less than 0.5). by Peng-fei Han (694841)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    Positive ion mode significant differential metabolites (Fold Change greater than 2 or less than 0.5).

    Positive ion mode significant differential metabolites (Fold Change greater than 2 or less than 0.5). by Peng-fei Han (694841)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Sobel test for the significance of the mediation effect.

    Sobel test for the significance of the mediation effect. by Getachew Magnar Kitila (19935139)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Availability of modern family planning methods in 2014 and 2017.

    Availability of modern family planning methods in 2014 and 2017. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    Facilities offering modern family planning services by division in 2014 (A) and 2017 (B).

    Facilities offering modern family planning services by division in 2014 (A) and 2017 (B). by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Facilities offering modern family planning services by survey years and facility types, 2014 and 2017.

    Facilities offering modern family planning services by survey years and facility types, 2014 and 2017. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    Factors associated with facility readiness for providing modern family planning services in 2014 and 2017.

    Factors associated with facility readiness for providing modern family planning services in 2014 and 2017. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    Modern family planning service readiness score by division in 2014 (A) and 2017 (B).

    Modern family planning service readiness score by division in 2014 (A) and 2017 (B). by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    Flowchart of the sample selection procedure from BHFS 2014 and 2017.

    Flowchart of the sample selection procedure from BHFS 2014 and 2017. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    Mean readiness score of modern family planning service by facility type in 2014 and 2017.

    Mean readiness score of modern family planning service by facility type in 2014 and 2017. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    Overall and domain-specific mean readiness score by survey years, 2014 and 2017.

    Overall and domain-specific mean readiness score by survey years, 2014 and 2017. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    Percentage distribution (weighted) of surveyed facilities in 2014 and 2017.

    Percentage distribution (weighted) of surveyed facilities in 2014 and 2017. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    Overview of the WeARTolerance program.

    Overview of the WeARTolerance program. by Ana Beato (20489933)

    Published 2024
    “…<div><p>The stigma surrounding mental health remains a significant barrier to help-seeking and well-being in youth populations. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: