Search alternatives:
significant small » significant male (Expand Search), significant all (Expand Search), significant shape (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
bias decrease » bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
significant small » significant male (Expand Search), significant all (Expand Search), significant shape (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
bias decrease » bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Supplementary Material for: Longitudinal Decrease in Left Ventricular Size with Age: Impact on Mortality and Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Published 2025“…The prognostic significance of reductions in LV size in hearts with normal baseline LV size remains unclear. …”
-
4
-
5
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The study encompassed 36 selected studies involving 44 effect sizes and 914 participants. The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Risk of bias graph.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Each subfigure shows a different local size (LS) and context size (CS) configuration, where the reliability of the model across different initializations is measured in R-squared.
Published 2025“…<p>In most cases where both the local size and context size is small, the DSVAE model is significantly more reliable than the IDSVAE method. …”
-
20