Search alternatives:
significant adverse » significant advantage (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
significant small » significantly smaller (Expand Search), significant spatial (Expand Search), significant overall (Expand Search)
adverse decrease » rivers decreased (Expand Search)
small increased » small decrease (Expand Search), soil increased (Expand Search)
significant adverse » significant advantage (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
significant small » significantly smaller (Expand Search), significant spatial (Expand Search), significant overall (Expand Search)
adverse decrease » rivers decreased (Expand Search)
small increased » small decrease (Expand Search), soil increased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in parity subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
4
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in gestational age subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
5
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
6
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in maternal race subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
7
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in gestational hypertension subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
8
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in preconception BMI subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
9
Relationship between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in different preconception BMI groups.
Published 2023Subjects: -
10
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in paternal age at delivery subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
11
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in maternal age at delivery subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Summary of responses on the significance of small ruminants as indicated by farmer percentages.
Published 2023Subjects: -
19
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
20