Search alternatives:
significant smear » significant linear (Expand Search), significant sex (Expand Search), significant seed (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant smear » significant linear (Expand Search), significant sex (Expand Search), significant seed (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Overall mean comparison of the smear layer among root canal irrigation solutions.
Published 2024Subjects: -
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Sensitivity analyses of seroprevalence with the largest sample size study omitted.
Published 2024Subjects: -
11
-
12
-
13
Projected decadal changes in seasonality in the hydrological cycle over the wetland regions.
Published 2024Subjects: -
14
Gambarini and Laszkiewicz [29] proposed a scoring system to classify the removal of smear layers.
Published 2024Subjects: -
15
Overall mean comparison of the smear layer between root levels and root canal irrigation solutions.
Published 2024Subjects: -
16
Changes in decadal precipitation and JULES inundation between 1990–1999 and 2089–2098.
Published 2024Subjects: -
17
The smear layer comparison in each group using hoc Dunn’s test corrected by Bonferroni.
Published 2025Subjects: -
18
-
19
The smear layer groups were compared by thirds’ mean rank using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Published 2025Subjects: -
20