The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations B1 –B5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

Subjects:

Comparison of rank correlation analysis results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

Subjects:

Comparison of the selected multi-criteria methods. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

Subjects:

Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

Subjects:

Description of results of SD-TOPSIS application (combination A) using selected moment characteristics. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

Subjects:

Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations B1-B5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

Subjects:

Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations C1-C10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

Subjects:

A set of 2 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations D1–D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

Subjects:

Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combination A. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

Subjects:

ANOM analysis of evaluated criteria K1–K5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

Subjects:

The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations C1 –C10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

Subjects:

The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combination A. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

Subjects:

Chart illustrates the treated groups (BM-MSC1, BM-MSC2, AD-MSC1, AD-MSC2) increasing in cell viability over replicates, while the untreated groups (Un-BM1, Un-BM2, Un-AD1, Un-AD2)... by Alani Mohanad Khalid Ahmed (22693496)

Comparison of the mean number of unique diagnoses per hospital admission, between 2000 and 2023, stratified by chapters of ICD-10. The table shows absolute and relative changes in... by Stuart A. Bowyer (21253319)

The mean and standard deviation of parameters. by Sadaf Sepasgozar Sarkhosh (20436143)

“…In both group, the DPSI also decreased significantly one month post-treatment compared to before and after treatment (P = 0.040 and P = 0.018, respectively). …”

The ANCOVA and Post_hoc results. by Sadaf Sepasgozar Sarkhosh (20436143)

“…In both group, the DPSI also decreased significantly one month post-treatment compared to before and after treatment (P = 0.040 and P = 0.018, respectively). …”

CONSORT flowchart. by Sadaf Sepasgozar Sarkhosh (20436143)

“…In both group, the DPSI also decreased significantly one month post-treatment compared to before and after treatment (P = 0.040 and P = 0.018, respectively). …”

Time to stabilization in the vertical direction. by Sadaf Sepasgozar Sarkhosh (20436143)

“…In both group, the DPSI also decreased significantly one month post-treatment compared to before and after treatment (P = 0.040 and P = 0.018, respectively). …”

The description of games. by Sadaf Sepasgozar Sarkhosh (20436143)

“…In both group, the DPSI also decreased significantly one month post-treatment compared to before and after treatment (P = 0.040 and P = 0.018, respectively). …”

The description of balance training. by Sadaf Sepasgozar Sarkhosh (20436143)

“…In both group, the DPSI also decreased significantly one month post-treatment compared to before and after treatment (P = 0.040 and P = 0.018, respectively). …”