Showing 141 - 160 results of 75,996 for search '(( significant spatial decrease ) OR ( significant ((a decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 0.69s Refine Results
  1. 141
  2. 142
  3. 143
  4. 144
  5. 145
  6. 146
  7. 147
  8. 148
  9. 149
  10. 150

    Capsaicin, pyridoxine, vincristine sulfate and ionomycin significantly decreased axon length ratio but only pyridoxine had no impact on neurotoxicity. by Fei San Lee (17282886)

    Published 2024
    “…(<b>C</b>) Pyr at 500 μM significantly decreased axon length ratio over time and was significantly lower than PBS control by day 3. …”
  11. 151
  12. 152
  13. 153

    Spatial variation of water availability in Hebi. by Shaolei Guo (3146259)

    Published 2024
    “…The results indicate that: (1) During the study period, the overall land use type in Hebi City has been constantly changing, with the most significant conversion from arable land to other land types; combined with its landscape pattern index, Hebi City has a general characteristic of significant landscape fragmentation and complexity in land use. (2) Habitat quality in Hebi shows an overall trend towards better development, with water availability decreasing and then increasing; the zoning of ecosystem services in Hebi is divided into three classes: superior, good and general, with the area covered by the superior and general classes expanding year by year. (3) Correlation analysis by SPSS software shows that the correlation between habitat quality and landscape pattern index is greater than the correlation between habitat quality and climate change. …”
  14. 154
  15. 155
  16. 156

    The research process for the present study. by Feng Huang (62988)

    Published 2024
    “…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
  17. 157

    The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB. by Feng Huang (62988)

    Published 2024
    “…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
  18. 158

    The interaction of PRGDP and Gi on SWB. by Feng Huang (62988)

    Published 2024
    “…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
  19. 159

    Descriptive statistics of variables. by Feng Huang (62988)

    Published 2024
    “…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
  20. 160