Search alternatives:
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
Significant spatial clusters of open defecation practice among households in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016.
Published 2022Subjects: -
123
TBSS results showing significant AxD and RD changes at baseline and the follow-up.
Published 2025“…The decreased diffusivity metrics (AxD and RD) exhibited no statistically significant differences at <i><i>P</i></i> < 0.05 after correcting for multiple comparisons (FWE). …”
-
124
Decreased thrombin activity levels in PAR KO following 24 hours following ischemia.
Published 2021“…<p>(A) Total thrombin activity is significantly decreased in PAR1 KO compared to WT mice (t-test). …”
-
125
-
126
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
-
131
-
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
-
136
The research process for the present study.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
137
The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
138
The interaction of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
139
Descriptive statistics of variables.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
140