Search alternatives:
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
step decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Adjustment step size.
Published 2025“…Integration efficiency increases by 18.7%, and computational complexity is significantly reduced, with average computation time decreased by 15.4%. …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
Summary of five key points guiding the Safe Steps evaluation and implementation.
Published 2025Subjects: -
6
-
7
-
8
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
Detection effect of different sizes.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20