Showing 101 - 120 results of 14,795 for search '(( significant spatial decrease ) OR ( significant ((teer decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 1.04s Refine Results
  1. 101
  2. 102
  3. 103
  4. 104
  5. 105
  6. 106
  7. 107

    TBSS results showing significant AxD and RD changes at baseline and the follow-up. by Sewon Lim (21989785)

    Published 2025
    “…The decreased diffusivity metrics (AxD and RD) exhibited no statistically significant differences at <i><i>P</i></i> < 0.05 after correcting for multiple comparisons (FWE). …”
  8. 108

    Decreased thrombin activity levels in PAR KO following 24 hours following ischemia. by Efrat Shavit-Stein (3186678)

    Published 2021
    “…<p>(A) Total thrombin activity is significantly decreased in PAR1 KO compared to WT mice (t-test). …”
  9. 109
  10. 110
  11. 111
  12. 112
  13. 113
  14. 114
  15. 115
  16. 116
  17. 117

    Spatial models. by Qian Chen (18883)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
  18. 118

    The research process for the present study. by Feng Huang (62988)

    Published 2024
    “…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
  19. 119

    The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB. by Feng Huang (62988)

    Published 2024
    “…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
  20. 120

    The interaction of PRGDP and Gi on SWB. by Feng Huang (62988)

    Published 2024
    “…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”