Showing 1 - 20 results of 3,933 for search '(( significant spatial decrease ) OR ( significant ((teer decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 0.43s Refine Results
  1. 1

    ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention. by Isabel Raposo (21615517)

    Published 2025
    “…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

    Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers. by Luqiong Liu (11537092)

    Published 2024
    “…The values are expressed as the means ± SDs and were analyzed according to the variance of the factorial design. **, *** and ****denote <i>p</i> < 0.01, < 0.001 and < 0.0001, respectively; ns  =  not significant.…”
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

    <b> </b> Rate of brain weight to body weight in different experimental groups. AlCl3 treatment caused a significant decrease in brain-to-body weight with respect to the control group (P < 0.01). 2 or 5 injections of BM-MSC extracted exosomes significantly protected against the deficit effect of Alcl3 on brain-to-body weight rate.... by Atefeh Sadeghi (21253051)

    Published 2025
    “…AlCl3 treatment caused a significant decrease in brain-to-body weight with respect to the control group (P < 0.01). 2 or 5 injections of BM-MSC extracted exosomes significantly protected against the deficit effect of Alcl3 on brain-to-body weight rate. …”
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19

    TBSS results showing significant AxD and RD changes at baseline and the follow-up. by Sewon Lim (21989785)

    Published 2025
    “…The decreased diffusivity metrics (AxD and RD) exhibited no statistically significant differences at <i><i>P</i></i> < 0.05 after correcting for multiple comparisons (FWE). …”
  20. 20