Showing 21 - 40 results of 11,494 for search '(( significant spatial decrease ) OR ( significant different degree ))', query time: 0.59s Refine Results
  1. 21

    S1 Data - by Ying Xie (50016)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
  2. 22
  3. 23
  4. 24

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…(C) In vCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.138 ± 0.065, APP/PS1 = 0.112 ± 0.035, p < 10<sup>−6</sup>, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 689 units from 6 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 651 units from 8 recording sessions). …”
  5. 25
  6. 26

    Significant between-group differences in degree centrality comparing the RTHβ group to healthy controls. by Martin Göttlich (477352)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Significant between-group differences in degree centrality comparing the RTHβ group to healthy controls.…”
  7. 27
  8. 28

    Spatial distribution of ESs. by Bao Zhou (20670850)

    Published 2025
    “…In future scenarios, the SDG index increases in the southern part while decreasing in the eastern part, indicating significant differences in regional sustainable development potential. …”
  9. 29
  10. 30
  11. 31

    Blood biomarkers significantly different among sedentary individuals and those who partake in running for exercise to various degrees. by Bartek Nogal (9323425)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>Blood biomarkers significantly different among sedentary individuals and those who partake in running for exercise to various degrees.…”
  12. 32

    Degree of significant results in terms of group EEG electrodes according to different number of flashing classification accuracy results. by Onur Erdem Korkmaz (12407485)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>Degree of significant results in terms of group EEG electrodes according to different number of flashing classification accuracy results.…”
  13. 33
  14. 34
  15. 35
  16. 36
  17. 37
  18. 38
  19. 39

    ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention. by Isabel Raposo (21615517)

    Published 2025
    “…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
  20. 40