Search alternatives:
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant body (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant body (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
-
1
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…(C) In vCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.138 ± 0.065, APP/PS1 = 0.112 ± 0.035, p < 10<sup>−6</sup>, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 689 units from 6 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 651 units from 8 recording sessions). …”
-
2
The spatial (districtwide) distribution of census population of Bangladesh in 2022.
Published 2024Subjects: -
3
-
4
-
5
The spatial pattern of dengue including hotspot and coldspot in Bangladesh in 2019–2023.
Published 2024Subjects: -
6
Supplemental Figure 2: Fold change of HOX genes in NULL compared to WT. Red dots indicate statistically significant increase.
Published 2022“…<p>Fold change increases of Hox genes are compared between NULL and WT groups in the aortic root. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
Number of significantly significant (P < 0.05) differentially abundant (SSDA) proteins showing increased or decreased activity (fold change +/- 1.5-fold) relative to time 0 following storage at 9°C or 20°C of infective juveniles of <i>S</i>....
Published 2022“…<p>Number of significantly significant (P < 0.05) differentially abundant (SSDA) proteins showing increased or decreased activity (fold change +/- 1.5-fold) relative to time 0 following storage at 9°C or 20°C of infective juveniles of <i>S</i>. …”
-
19
-
20
Significant spatial clusters of open defecation practice among households in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016.
Published 2022Subjects: