Search alternatives:
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
significant larger » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
larger increases » large increases (Expand Search), marked increases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search)
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
significant larger » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
larger increases » large increases (Expand Search), marked increases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…(C) In vCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.138 ± 0.065, APP/PS1 = 0.112 ± 0.035, p < 10<sup>−6</sup>, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 689 units from 6 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 651 units from 8 recording sessions). …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
Structure stabilizes larger numbers of species, but increasing competitive asymmetry increases species loss.
Published 2021“…<b>(B)</b> Comparing identical conditions between two different system sizes (<i>L</i> = 100 and <i>L</i> = 200), the effects of disorder are relatively small in comparison to the effects of system size, with smaller system sizes (blue lines) showing a significant amplification of reduction in survival probability as compared to the larger system. …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Significant spatial clusters of open defecation practice among households in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016.
Published 2022Subjects: -
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
DataSheet_2_Climate factors drive plant distributions at higher taxonomic scales and larger spatial scales.docx
Published 2024“…Edaphic factors congruously decreased their importance on plant distributions as spatial and taxonomic scales increased. …”
-
18
DataSheet_3_Climate factors drive plant distributions at higher taxonomic scales and larger spatial scales.docx
Published 2024“…Edaphic factors congruously decreased their importance on plant distributions as spatial and taxonomic scales increased. …”
-
19
DataSheet_1_Climate factors drive plant distributions at higher taxonomic scales and larger spatial scales.docx
Published 2024“…Edaphic factors congruously decreased their importance on plant distributions as spatial and taxonomic scales increased. …”
-
20
Spatial information of excitatory neurons in APP/PS1 mice are decreased in dCA1 and vCA1.
Published 2024“…<p>(A) In dCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.134 ± 0.050, APP/PS1 = 0.132 ± 0.054, p < 0.01, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 229 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 124 units from 4 recording sessions). …”