Search alternatives:
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
longer decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
longer decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
The spatial distribution of ozone concentration in China’s provinces in 2015 and 2019.
Published 2024Subjects: -
126
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
-
131
-
132
Pan-cancer analyses of ACADM expression and its prognostic significance in the TCGA database.
Published 2025Subjects: -
133
-
134
The research process for the present study.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
135
The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
136
The interaction of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
137
Descriptive statistics of variables.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
138
-
139
-
140
The relationship between road network characteristics and the severity of traffic accidents.
Published 2023Subjects: