Search alternatives:
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
spatial increase » initial increase (Expand Search), optimal increase (Expand Search), seasonal increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
spatial increase » initial increase (Expand Search), optimal increase (Expand Search), seasonal increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
-
23
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
24
-
25
Spatial distribution of rainfall using Inverse Distance Weighted Interpolation (IDWI).
Published 2024Subjects: -
26
-
27
Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group.
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
28
-
29
-
30
Between-groups comparison of GIN and PPI values in control, tinnitus and PBMT groups.
Published 2024Subjects: -
31
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
Between groups comparison of BTT and threshold in control, tinnitus and PBMT groups.
Published 2024Subjects: -
37
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
38
-
39
-
40
Mean interval from initial diagnosis to initiation of non-pharmacological treatment by year.
Published 2025Subjects: