Transcriptional and translational markers of syncytialization and biochemical differentiation are significantly decreased by rotenone. by O’Llenecia S. Walker (8486163)

Spatial stability is decreased in APP/PS1 mice in both dCA1 and vCA1. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

“…<p>(A) In dCA1, stability score was significantly decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = -0.009 ± 0.292, APP/PS1 = -0.1845 ± 0.256, p < 10⁻⁶, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n_C57BL/6 = 295 units from 5 recording sessions, n_APP/PS1 = 167 units from 4 recording sessions). …”

Feature importance of the extracted characteristics from the simulation using Mean Decrease in Impurity (MDI). by Simon Bin Akter (17951860)

SD and mean TTC under different weights. by Jianrong Cai (14245136)

Subjects:

The research process for the present study. by Feng Huang (62988)

“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”

The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB. by Feng Huang (62988)

“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”

The interaction of PRGDP and Gi on SWB. by Feng Huang (62988)

“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”

Descriptive statistics of variables. by Feng Huang (62988)

“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”

Fitted spatial autoregressive models. by Kwun Chuen Gary Chan (3641947)

Comparison of ∑PBB, ∑BDE, ∑PCN and ∑DDT concentrations and concentrations of some congeners in eggs analyzed in this study and other relevant studies (ng/g ww, geometric mean and r... by Matti Viluksela (321291)

Subjects:

Distribution of digital financial inclusion impact on carbon intensity gap in agriculture by province. by Lingzhi Tan (19146572)

<i>Kpna1</i> KO mice show significant impairment in short-term recognition memory and avoidance learning and/or memory. by Koki Sakurai (11690201)

A spatial Durbin model compared to a spatial error and lag model. by Sakar Hasan Hamza (20978818)

Subjects:

Spatial information of excitatory neurons in APP/PS1 mice are decreased in dCA1 and vCA1. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

“…<p>(A) In dCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.134 ± 0.050, APP/PS1 = 0.132 ± 0.054, p < 0.01, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n_C57BL/6 = 229 units from 5 recording sessions, n_APP/PS1 = 124 units from 4 recording sessions). …”

Mean scores, standard deviations, and significance on key measures and subscales by gender group. by Silas Manning (22693338)

Machine Learning Model Performance Sorted by Decreasing MAE. by Renan N. D. Almeida (9265283)

Significant decrease of the viability of A375 melanoma cells after CD treatment. by Lena Berning (7430117)

Comparing demographic data (mean values). by Tamer Shousha (10960632)

Subjects:

Forecast of the spatial pattern. by Fengge Yao (12988315)

Spatial distribution of the CCD. by Fengge Yao (12988315)