Search alternatives:
significant sup » significant snp (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant sex (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
sup based » snp based (Expand Search), app based (Expand Search)
significant sup » significant snp (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant sex (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
sup based » snp based (Expand Search), app based (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Data for subjects with significant slopes (regional progression or recovery colour coded, non-significant regions white) for the 4 data types over the study period.
Published 2023“…<p>The only diabetic (non-DMO) person with significant thickness changes was mf87171 (row I). …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
<i>HLA-DQB1/DQA2</i> rs9274619:A significantly interacts with T2D on triglycerides.
Published 2022Subjects: -
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment.
Published 2023“…<p>Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment.…”
-
18
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025Subjects: -
19
-
20