Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant surface » significant source (Expand Search), significant guidance (Expand Search), significant sources (Expand Search)
surface analysis » variance analysis (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant surface » significant source (Expand Search), significant guidance (Expand Search), significant sources (Expand Search)
surface analysis » variance analysis (Expand Search)
-
1
Significantly decreased necrosis observed on wheat leaves inoculated with <i>ΔZtknr4</i>.
Published 2025“…Lower panel depicts the colour classification of tissue exhibiting healthy (green), chlorosis (yellow), and necrosis (grey) phenotypes as determined by LemnaGrid image analysis system. <b>B.</b> Lower panel shows the relative proportion of each leaf surface classified as healthy, chlorosis, or necrosis phenotypes using LemnaGrid image analysis system (N = 3). …”
-
2
SBP3 KD decreases the surface localization of VESA-1.
Published 2024“…(B) Fluorescence intensities of SBP3, VESA-1 and SBP4 near the surface of iRBCs before (-) and after (+) SBP3 KD (n = 10, ns; non-significant; **** p < 0.0001; determined by multiple t-test) (C) Western blot analysis of SBP3-<i>glmS</i> clones with (+) or without (-) of glucosamine (GlcN). …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Intracellular retention, but not shedding of NKp65 molecules containing threonine at amino acid position 131 causes decreased surface expression.
Published 2025“…D, staining of permeabilized 293-F transfectants for both intracellular and surface NKp65 with M2, OMAR1 and OMAR2 antibodies. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
18
-
19
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
20
Inotodiol decreases clone formation in HCC cells.
Published 2025“…Animal studies demonstrated that inotodiol possessed the ability to suppress tumor growth in nude mice models, at the same time, there was no significant impact on the body weight and organs of the mice. …”