Search alternatives:
significant teer » significant gender (Expand Search), significant trend (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant teer » significant gender (Expand Search), significant trend (Expand Search), significant genes (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
201
NgR1 KO mice exhibited an increase in excitatory synapses and a decrease in inhibitory synapses, indicating an imbalance of synaptic transmission.
Published 2025“…The inhibitory synaptic density of NgR1 mice showed a significant decrease when compared to WT mice (***P < 0.001). …”
-
202
-
203
-
204
-
205
-
206
-
207
-
208
-
209
MiR-129-5p levels were decreased in mouse depression models.
Published 2025“…</b> The KEGG pathway analysis identifies the number of target genes within each pathway. Those with a p-value < 0.05 are considered significant. <b>L.…”
-
210
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
211
-
212
-
213
-
214
-
215
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Manhattan plot of minJSW decrease at 24 months. …”
-
216
-
217
-
218
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
219
-
220