Search alternatives:
significant test » significance test (Expand Search), significant threat (Expand Search), significance tests (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
test based » test cases (Expand Search), test case (Expand Search)
significant test » significance test (Expand Search), significant threat (Expand Search), significance tests (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
test based » test cases (Expand Search), test case (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
-
64
Raster diagrams illustrating significant FRP differences obtained with cluster-based permutation tests.
Published 2019“…The vertical black lines indicate the time windows considered for the cluster-based permutation tests: between between 0–70 ms, 70–120 ms, 120–300 ms, 300–500 ms. …”
-
65
QTLs identified and their association with the KASP Markers based on significant difference by Kruskal-Wallis test.
Published 2022“…<p>QTLs identified and their association with the KASP Markers based on significant difference by Kruskal-Wallis test.…”
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
-
70
-
71
-
72
-
73
Tests for significant covariation need to not use covariation in producing their alignments.
Published 2023Subjects: -
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
-
79
-
80