Search alternatives:
significant text » significant threat (Expand Search), significant trend (Expand Search), significant event (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
text based » test based (Expand Search)
significant text » significant threat (Expand Search), significant trend (Expand Search), significant event (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
text based » test based (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Increased connectivity in the red lines and decreased connectivity in the blue lines.
Published 2023Subjects: -
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM.
Published 2019“…Error bars represent ± SEM; n.s., non significant,*<i>P</i> < 0.05,**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA. …”
-
9
Cortical mapping of the fraction of significant voxels for other dimensions of fastText vectors.
Published 2021“…<p>The mean fraction of significant voxels in each brain region for fastText vector-based models was mapped onto the cortical surface (<b>A</b>, vector dimension = 100; <b>B</b>, 300; <b>C</b>, 500; <b>D</b>, 2000). …”
-
10
-
11
AMPs are increased in lesional HS, but DCD and other sweat-gland associated proteins are decreased.
Published 2019“…Genes represented in orange were unchanged (FC < 2, p-adj < 0.05) in HS lesional vs. HS non-lesional skin. Non-adjusted p-values were used for generation of the volcano plot to minimize points with tied y-values but significance level was set using the corresponding non-adjusted p-values. …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
Layout of plane measurement points at three different heights and the vicinity of the source area.
Published 2024Subjects: -
15
-
16
ChatGPT-generated text examples incorporating aspect words based on the original text.
Published 2024Subjects: -
17
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
18
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
19
-
20