Search alternatives:
significant threat » significant effect (Expand Search), significant increase (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
bins decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search)
threat based » wheat based (Expand Search), test based (Expand Search), areas based (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant threat » significant effect (Expand Search), significant increase (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
bins decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search)
threat based » wheat based (Expand Search), test based (Expand Search), areas based (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Correlation and significance.
Published 2025“…Across all regression models, neither threat possibility nor threat severity showed statistically significant associations (p > 0.01) with preparedness intentions. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Variance Significance Factor (VSF).
Published 2025“…Across all regression models, neither threat possibility nor threat severity showed statistically significant associations (p > 0.01) with preparedness intentions. …”
-
11
-
12
Cell-autonomous and non-cell autonomous effects of neuronal BIN1 loss <i>in vivo</i>
Published 2019“…Furthermore, the level of neuronal-specific BIN1 isoform 1 protein is decreased in sporadic AD cases in parallel with neuronal loss, despite an overall increase in BIN1 total mRNA. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Comparison of the threat reaction with vs. without pairing.
Published 2025“…<b>(C)</b> Top: difference between the horizontal eye movements in response to synchronous pairing of the artificial limb, versus no-pairing. Blue sections: significant differences (Bootstrap-based test <i>p</i> < 0.05). …”