Search alternatives:
significant threat » significant effect (Expand Search), significant increase (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
threat based » wheat based (Expand Search), test based (Expand Search), areas based (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant threat » significant effect (Expand Search), significant increase (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
threat based » wheat based (Expand Search), test based (Expand Search), areas based (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Correlation and significance.
Published 2025“…Across all regression models, neither threat possibility nor threat severity showed statistically significant associations (p > 0.01) with preparedness intentions. …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment.
Published 2023“…<p>Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment.…”
-
9
Variance Significance Factor (VSF).
Published 2025“…Across all regression models, neither threat possibility nor threat severity showed statistically significant associations (p > 0.01) with preparedness intentions. …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Depleted antibody secreting cells did not result in decreased donor specific antibody in non-sensitized animals.
Published 2022“…(A) T (CD3<sup>+</sup>) and (B) B (CD45R<sup>+</sup>) cell flow crossmatch was performed in non-sensitized animals. IgG1<sup>+</sup> in the T cell flow crossmatch was the only DSA that BLyS<sup>-/-</sup> significantly decreased compared to APRIL<sup>-/-</sup> (p<0.03). …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Comparison of the threat reaction with vs. without pairing.
Published 2025“…<b>(C)</b> Top: difference between the horizontal eye movements in response to synchronous pairing of the artificial limb, versus no-pairing. Blue sections: significant differences (Bootstrap-based test <i>p</i> < 0.05). …”